<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now look &#8211; I&#8217;m no MSFT basher, but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://issuesblog.com/2008/01/28/now-look-im-no-msft-basher-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://issuesblog.com/2008/01/28/now-look-im-no-msft-basher-but/</link>
	<description>Blather on business, pontification on politics, &#038; mutterings on miscellanea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Patton</title>
		<link>http://issuesblog.com/2008/01/28/now-look-im-no-msft-basher-but/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://issuesblog.com/2008/01/28/now-look-im-no-msft-basher-but/#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Seriously, I&#039;ve been stifling this urge for some time, thinking that it will eventually get better. And it never does - at odd times of the day or night, the machine just stops responding to me, all running applications lock up, and I&#039;m forced to wait until they unlock before moving forward.

It&#039;s a memory hog, which isn&#039;t a big deal - most anyone can double the memory in their computer (as I&#039;ve already done here). The problem is that it&#039;s got inherent flaws that memory won&#039;t fix. The memory footprint is literally twice that of XP, and the performance appears to be half that of XP. 

When I really need to get something done in a hurry, I could borrow my old Thinkpad (half the memory, only single processor, lower clock speed, but running XP) from my daughter and be miles ahead.

Vista&#039;s flatly a piece of crap, in other words. I&#039;ll never buy another machine with Vista installed, and if I&#039;m ever asked (by someone that I don&#039;t hate) whether they should install Vista, I&#039;ll answer with an definitive No!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, I&#8217;ve been stifling this urge for some time, thinking that it will eventually get better. And it never does &#8211; at odd times of the day or night, the machine just stops responding to me, all running applications lock up, and I&#8217;m forced to wait until they unlock before moving forward.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a memory hog, which isn&#8217;t a big deal &#8211; most anyone can double the memory in their computer (as I&#8217;ve already done here). The problem is that it&#8217;s got inherent flaws that memory won&#8217;t fix. The memory footprint is literally twice that of XP, and the performance appears to be half that of XP. </p>
<p>When I really need to get something done in a hurry, I could borrow my old Thinkpad (half the memory, only single processor, lower clock speed, but running XP) from my daughter and be miles ahead.</p>
<p>Vista&#8217;s flatly a piece of crap, in other words. I&#8217;ll never buy another machine with Vista installed, and if I&#8217;m ever asked (by someone that I don&#8217;t hate) whether they should install Vista, I&#8217;ll answer with an definitive No!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://issuesblog.com/2008/01/28/now-look-im-no-msft-basher-but/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://issuesblog.com/2008/01/28/now-look-im-no-msft-basher-but/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>AHHAAAH! Believe it or not I&#039;ve been wanting to ask someone who knows about such things for a few months. I noticed a while ago that when I restarted in safe mode (a simulacrum of Win 95 or somesuch, not bells-and-whistles Vista anyway), pursuant to a big blue screen of death crash (creepily overfrequent, now), &lt;i&gt;my machine ran like a fucking dream&lt;/i&gt;. Really fast, properly fast. And so I began to wonder, maybe my new HP&#039;s mysterious performance issues aren&#039;t anything of the sort, maybe Vista just sucks. I find your confirmation of this possibility, like most of what I know you ever to have said, intriguing, and perhaps when a couple more months of blithe passivity have gone by, I will revert. Gotta find the disk somewhere.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHHAAAH! Believe it or not I&#8217;ve been wanting to ask someone who knows about such things for a few months. I noticed a while ago that when I restarted in safe mode (a simulacrum of Win 95 or somesuch, not bells-and-whistles Vista anyway), pursuant to a big blue screen of death crash (creepily overfrequent, now), <i>my machine ran like a fucking dream</i>. Really fast, properly fast. And so I began to wonder, maybe my new HP&#8217;s mysterious performance issues aren&#8217;t anything of the sort, maybe Vista just sucks. I find your confirmation of this possibility, like most of what I know you ever to have said, intriguing, and perhaps when a couple more months of blithe passivity have gone by, I will revert. Gotta find the disk somewhere&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
